

At level cap, I have about 20 of those and a friend has 26, both of us with room to spare. And surely, you don't think they're creating this game like a cartoon train, laying out the tracks just before they roll down them, do you? They have plenty already done, I assure you.įor the record there is, according to my calculations, currently the potential for 83 companions. Adding more female NPCs (or making already existing ones available early) doesn't mean that everyone at KI has to drop what they're doing just to accomplish that one goal. My point is that to change one thing in a game is not necessarily to ignore all the others. Your point seems to be that any girly additions will just have to wait until after they've fixed the glitches and released all the new worlds. Did I shake my fist and insist on an immediate fix? I did not. Do I think it was all some sexist plot? I do not. Entitled is exactly how I would describe a young man who refers to wanting to see gender balance in a family game as "demanding". It's funny that you should use the terms entitled and demanding to describe me, however. I hope I've been more clear without offending you again.While I assumed you might be unaware of how your original response came across, (and clearly, you weren't) I am well aware that my own response to you was quite pointed. Again, you may have not meant it that way, but that's how this 20-year-old interpreted them. I hope I've been more clear without offending you again.Įl Christo on wrote:Regardless of how you interpreted my last post, I am finding the tone in your own posts entitled or demanding rather than convincing or hopeful. The best you (or anyone) can do is drop a hint (not a demand) that the programmers keep your hopes in mind. I'm sure that over the course of the game there will be enough companions to fit your (or your daughter's) standards, but I wouldn't argue for it being a priority when there are glitches to fix and new worlds to release. I was trying to argue quality over quantity as well Bonnie (and to an extent, Sarah) has a really major role in the game and your crew, regardless of how 'rare' her gender is, not to mention you yourself can choose a female character as your leader. I just meant to hint that the expectation of programmers churning out enough female Companions to fit a 16-member line up is a tad unrealistic, at least within the first few months of the game. Regardless of how you interpreted my last post, I am finding the tone in your own posts entitled or demanding rather than convincing or hopeful. A pink non-sentient doesn't cut it, thanks.You dont see how wanting an "all girl team" is discrimination? Double standards!!! How is wanting to see a fair gender balance over all (and an all-girl team personally) discrimination? A pink non-sentient doesn't cut it, thanks.Ī Mythspent Youth on wrote:You know, I understood all the words you wrote there, but taken as a whole none of what you said makes any sense. We're over half the population in the real world, so it stands to reason that we should be more than 5 of the companion compliment in the Spiral.

While I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, the message you've just sent to a 10-year-old is essentially, "Be grateful you got Bonnie Anne and get over it."Īs a grown woman, I agree with the girl here.

She alone has plenty of girl power You know, I understood all the words you wrote there, but taken as a whole none of what you said makes any sense. I'd simply suggest to her to keep Bonnie as a first mate for now. Maybe in the future we'll have more feminine Companions, but do your daughter as a Cap'n really want to discriminate? El Christo on wrote:That doesn't sound very feasible.
